With IT infrastructure growing more complex and teams under pressure to do more with less, it’s time for organizations to rethink their observability strategy before costs, burnout, and blind spots spiral out of control.

Across industries, legacy observability tools are buckling under the weight of today’s dynamic infrastructure. These traditional monitoring systems were designed for a world where environments barely moved, data trickled in manageable amounts, and collecting more metrics felt like progress.

But that era is long gone, and teams stuck in ‘collect everything’ mode are paying the price with runaway costs, spiraling complexity, and blind spots that turn small hiccups into full-blown outages.

In today’s fast-moving, containerized world, this strategy is backfiring. What once felt like a safety net has morphed into a data landfill, drowning teams in noise, burning them out, and surprising them with cost overruns that deliver the only visibility nobody wants: a meeting with the CFO to justify the bill.

The observability promise that fell apart

For years, engineering teams were sold a simple idea: more data meant more control. That advice made sense when infrastructure was static and applications evolved slowly – capturing everything often delivered the insights teams needed. But the rise of cloud technology changed everything, turning environments ephemeral and accelerating the pace of change and telemetry growth. Yet many teams still cling to the old ‘collect everything’ strategy, even as it drags them down.

Modern systems don’t wait. They scale instantly, shift constantly, and produce overwhelming volumes of telemetry. The tools that once brought stability are falling behind; they weren’t built for today’s level of scale or complexity. They’ve become rigid, noisy, and expensive, and the cracks are starting to show.

In sectors like aviation, even brief outages can result in millions of dollars in losses within minutes. Elsewhere, the fallout is just as real: frustrated customers, eroded trust, and reputational damage.

What once felt like a smart investment has quietly become a liability. Many organizations are waking up to the uncomfortable truth: their observability stack is no longer fit for purpose. Instead of becoming the true utility teams can rely on, it adds to the technical debt they’re actively trying to mitigate.

When teams can’t separate signal from noise, dashboards become cluttered with irrelevant metrics, alerts never cease, and real issues slip through the cracks. This constant stream of distractions imposes a steep distraction tax: every context switch, every false alarm, every hunt for meaning chips away at an engineer’s productive time and mental energy.

Over time, this chaos breeds reliance on tribal knowledge from a few seasoned ‘heroes’ who know where the bodies are buried. These heroes become the crutch that props up the system, celebrated for their late-night saves. However, a hero culture comes at a high price, with burnout, a lack of knowledge sharing, and stalled innovation, as teams spend more time firefighting than building differentiating features.

Observability should enable innovation, not kill it. When engineers are drowning in data without clarity, the best they can do is react. And in a world moving this fast, organizations that can’t move past constant triage will find themselves leapfrogged by the competition.

What does good observability look like?

Solving this problem isn’t just about new tools – it demands a strategic approach to your business pain. A strong observability strategy helps you deliver a better customer experience, enhance employee productivity, and increase conversion rates and revenue.

It delivers clear insights into the performance of your digital investments by revealing feature adoption trends, capacity and scaling gaps, and release quality and velocity issues. Done right, observability fuels a culture shift where teams embrace it as an enabler, not another distraction tax.

A clear telemetry collection methodology is essential to make observability a strategic asset rather than an operational burden. This methodology should be guided by well-defined Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and error budgets, which set the standard for what matters most to your business and customers.

By aligning telemetry collection with these objectives, you ensure your observability strategy surfaces only the data that helps measure and improve outcomes. This disciplined approach connects engineering efforts directly to business value, enabling teams to confidently invest in features, optimize performance, and scale systems without getting lost in the data deluge.

Even the best telemetry strategy will fail if observability is treated as an afterthought or siloed concern. Successful organizations make observability a shared responsibility by embedding it into team norms, workflows, and incentives. That starts with clear executive sponsorship to set expectations, coupled with training that gives every engineer confidence in reading, interpreting, and acting on telemetry data.

Organizational Change Management (OCM) practices help teams adopt observability incrementally, shifting the culture from reactive heroes to proactive, data-driven improvement. When observability becomes part of how everyone builds and operates software, it transforms from a distraction into a force multiplier for innovation and resilience.

Observability done right isn’t optional – it’s a competitive advantage. Teams that treat it as a strategic utility, guided by clear objectives and supported by a culture of shared responsibility, will outpace those stuck in reactive firefighting.

Now is the time to rethink your observability strategy: invest in disciplined telemetry, align it with what matters most to your business, and empower your teams to build with confidence. Strong observability turns bold strategies into market leadership and keeps your teams focused on the future.

We’ve listed the best business intelligence platform.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro